Ofer Shapira

Silicon Valley telenovela edition 😅:

Machine translation from the original post. Not reviewed by a human translator. Historical claims may no longer be current.

Silicon Valley telenovela edition 😅:
The Windsurf development tool from the AI-based coding startup (recently acquired by OpenAI for $3 billion!) found itself under attack from the least expected direction: its competitor Anthropic. Yes, the one responsible for the Claude model that leads the market in code-understanding ability and is therefore also clearly preferred in the industry for development.

Shortly after the acquisition, Anthropic blocked Windsurf's access to its main models, a logical and expected move since the company was sold to its rival, but the move also caused deep shock in the team and the product.

The response? Within just five days Windsurf implemented third-party solutions and added workarounds so users could keep working with Claude! Even though the solution is expensive and complex.

That is, instead of switching to OpenAI's models (the new owners), Windsurf chose to keep paying for indirect access to Anthropic's models.

🤝 There is no clearer way to say "I trust you" than to spend more money on it.

The move sparked wide discussion:
What happens when AI companies use an aggressive competitive approach?
Does it harm innovation?
And what does it say about startups' dependence on technology vendors?

Not boring for a moment in the GEN AI scene

Illustration for “Why Windsurf kept Claude after its $3 billion acquisition”